Researchers from Indian national institutes publish in predatory journals


The paper published in Current Science exposes the practice of researchers from CSIR, ICAR, ICMR, IITs and NITs publishing in predatory journals.

India not only publishes the most number of predatory journals in the world but researchers based in India are one of the biggest contributors to such bogus journals; an earlier study found that researchers in India accounted for 35 per cent of publication in bogus journals.

Predatory journals very often trick authors into submitting papers, rarely peer-review manuscripts thus allowing sub-standard papers and even those that contain plagiarised content and falsified and fabricated data to be published, rarely index papers with standard indexing bodies and are more focussed on article processing fees.

Based on 3,300 papers published between September 2015 and mid-February 2016 and randomly chosen from 350 predatory journals, researchers found that 51 per cent of papers in predatory journals were published by researchers from colleges affiliated to universities and autonomous colleges. It was followed by private universities/institutes (18 per cent), State universities (15 per cent) and national institutes (11 per cent).  The results were published in the journal Current Science.

What is more surprising is that researchers from ICAR, CSIR, and ICMR labs, and national institutes such as IITs and NITs too published papers in such junk journals.  Of the 11 per cent publication from national institutes, ICAR labs had the most number of publications (17 per cent). It was closely followed by CSIR at 15 per cent, NITs at 11 per cent, IITs at 9 per cent and ICMR at 6 per cent.

“Among the State universities, Annamalai University in Tamil Nadu has the most number of papers (70) published in predatory journals, while at seven papers Banaras Hindu University (BHU) Varanasi has the highest number among the central universities,” says G.S. Seethapathy from the University of Oslo, Norway and the corresponding author of the paper. “The National Chemical Laboratory (NCL), Pune has 15 papers while the Delhi-based Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology (IGIB) has 12 papers. Among the ICAR institutes, the Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bangalore (17) and the Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi (12) have the most papers in such journals. In the case of IITs, IIT Bhubaneswar has eight papers.”

Of the 480 researchers who responded to a questionnaire, 20 per cent claimed that they were unaware that their paper was published in a predatory journal. While 10 per cent said they knowingly published papers in these journals, the remaining 70 per cent were not willing to answer the question.

How well the funding bodies that provide research grants monitor the quality of publication comes under cross hairs as 112 research grants were documented in the papers published in these journals. Nodal bodies such as DST, DBT, UGC besides AYUSH had provided most of the 112 research grants.

The publish or perish situation has now turned grave with pressure to publish becoming enormous for researchers both at the stage of appointment and promotion. In the study, 75 per cent of the respondents admitted that they were under “pressure to publish research articles”.

Due to this pressure, quantity and not the quality has become the focal point both for both researchers and for institutions. Predatory journals, which by default publish even the most ludicrous manuscript for a huge fee, have therefore come handy. It’s a win-win situation for researchers who are unable to do quality research and those publishing predatory journals. Little wonder that the number of predatory journals published from India is ever increasing. It is true that some researchers are genuinely cheated into submitting papers to such bogus journals but that number seems to be quite small.

“The introduction of academic performance indicator (API) by the University Grants Commission (UGC), lack of clarity in identifying and evaluating journals, the focus on ‘quantity’ over ‘quality’, unhealthy competition between peers, and overall, a favourable non-scientific publishing environment have led Indian researchers to publish in mediocre journals wherein most manuscripts are published without any peer review. Perhaps it is also the fear of peer review that has nourished predatory journals, making India one of the world’s largest base for predatory open-access publishing,” notes a September 2014 Editorial in Current Science.

“Universities need to re-examine the way they perform academic evaluation. They need to stop counting the number of one’s publications as a method for academic evaluation. This counting leads people to pay for easy publishing in predatory journals, and this, in turn, leads to a proliferation of predatory journals. The same would apply to government laboratories as well,” Prof. Jeffrey Beall, Scholarly Communications Librarian at Auraria Library, University of Colorado, Denver had told me earlier. Prof. Beall coined the term “predatory journal” and has prepared a long list of such journals which any serious researcher can refer to to avoid getting trapped.

Published in The Hindu on December 15, 2016



  1. It is relly pathetic situation in research publications in India. This is the situations when our country have enough funding for good research teams and good projects. Most fo the Universities (state as well as central) are given or getting UGC-SAP support, DST-FIST support worth grant in crores of rupeese but there is no monitoring on the outcomes. Funding agencies should be strict on out put instead showering sympathy. There should be strict regulations and detailed guidelines where to publish papers. Faculty memerbs in Universities getting promotions without quality papers, research grants and Ph.D produced with impact and good journals. Such promotions should be re-examined through National level peer expert team.


  2. It’s very disgusting that our research is in doldrums. We shall be on top or even on higher position in rating instead we occupied the top position on reverse orientation. The first question in mind is who is accountable for this situation? I feel, only researchers are not responsible for this, all stakeholders shall share the due credit as per their contribution and liabilities.. If I superimpose the situation on a scientific paper than I found researchers should be co-author or joint lead author with policy makers along with other stakeholder’s (head of the institution, recruitment panels, funding agencies, etc) contributions as coauthors. It’s high time to implement the recommendations of new education policy on higher education which advocating the quality research. The committee also discussed the corrupt practices in recruitment, selection of head of the institution shall be free from political influence, assessment of the faculty on regular basis etc. There shall be strong safeguards at each level to improve the quality of research subjectively along with objectivity..


    1. An awareness about the predatory journal is a must and I am glad to read this post. My blood boils when I see the established researchers from reputed government institutes publishing in predatory journals. I am not sure if the philosophy of science or publication process is taught in science colleges or research institutes. I think, what we need is awareness drive and strictest form of punishment on publishing in predatory journals. Anyways, thanks a lot for writing this post.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s