With 33 more problematic papers spotted on Pubpeer today, the total number of papers containing manipulated and/or duplicated images now stands at 106. Has Indian Institute of Toxicology Research become a factory churning out papers with questionable images? If the images are questionable, will the results in such papers still be valid?
There are 33 more papers from the Indian Institute of Toxicology Research (CSIR-IITR), Lucknow that have been posted on Pubpeer website for the same reasons — image manipulation and duplication. This comes a day after 73 problematic papers from CSIR-IITR were found listed on Pubpeer, taking the grand total to 106 papers.
Today, the main authors in the papers are different and the researchers who have posted these papers on the Pubpeer website are also very different.

Duplication within the same paper.
For a few papers, the authors have made an attempt to explain certain discrepancies cited on Pubpeer but have not been able to provide answers for all the problems identified in the images.
There are many researchers who are co-authors in at least one of the problematic papers. While hopefully a few would have actually indulged in manipulating the images, one begins to wonder if others were completely in the dark about this unethical practice or were silent participants or spectators.
With 106 problematic papers published between 2004 and 2018 by different teams and labs at CSIR-IITR, the institute appears to have become a factory churning out papers with questionable images. If the images are questionable, will results in all such papers still be valid? Or will we soon see the first wave of retractions coming from CSIR-IITR?
The concerns raised by Dr. Elisabeth M. Bik, Science consultant at Harbers-Bik LLC, San Francisco, California and others in a 2016 paper in the journal mBio is turning out to be true. The authors had studied the country of origin for each of the 348 papers with problematic images published in the journal PLOS ONE. And what they found was highly disturbing — the proportion of papers containing problematic images was higher in the case of China and India.
Dr. Bik and her team also found that authors of such questionable papers tend to be repeat offenders. This was true in the case of CSIR-IITR researchers too; though the numbers varied the trend was clear.
List of problematic papers listed on Pubpeer
Divya Vimal, Sanjay Saini, Ravi Ram Kristipati, Debapratim Kar Chowdhuri
Chemosphere (2019)
Prakash Pragya, Arvind Kumar Shukla, Ramesh Chandra Murthy, Malik Zainul Abdin, Debapratim Kar Chowdhuri
PLoS ONE (2014)
Subash Chandra Gupta, Hifzur Rahman Siddique, Neeraj Mathur, Achchhe Lal Vishwakarma, Ranjit Kishore Mishra, Daya Krishna Saxena, Debapratim Kar Chowdhuri
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (2007)
Anshuman Singh, Anubha Mudawal, Pratibha Maurya, Rajeev Jain, Saumya Nair, Rajendra K. Shukla, Sanjay Yadav, Dhirendra Singh, Vinay Kumar Khanna, Rajnish Kumar Chaturvedi, Mohana K. R. Mudiam, Rao Sethumadhavan, Mohammad Imran Siddiqi, Devendra Parmar
Molecular Neurobiology (2016)
Swati Agarwal, Shashi Kant Tiwari, Brashket Seth, Anuradha Yadav, Anshuman Singh, Anubha Mudawal, Lalit Kumar Singh Chauhan, Shailendra Kumar Gupta, Vinay Choubey, Anurag Tripathi, Amit Kumar, Ratan Singh Ray, Shubha Shukla, Devendra Parmar, Rajnish Kumar Chaturvedi
Journal of Biological Chemistry (2015)
Anubha Mudawal, Ankita Srivastava, Anshuman Singh, Jai Shankar, Sanjay Yadav, Manisha Mishra, Pradhyumna K. Singh, Vinay K. Khanna, Devendra Parmar
Food and Chemical Toxicology (2018)
Vijay K Sonkar, Paresh P Kulkarni, Susheel N Chaurasia, Ayusman Dash, Abhishek Jauhari, Devendra Parmar, Sanjay Yadav, Debabrata Dash
Molecular Medicine (2016)
8) Prenatal exposure to lambda-cyhalothrin alters brain dopaminergic signaling in developing rats
Yogesh K. Dhuriya, Pranay Srivastava, Rajendra K. Shukla, Richa Gupta, Dhirendra Singh, Devendra Parmar, Aditya B. Pant, Vinay K. Khanna
Toxicology (2017)
Sushila Patel, Mahima Bajpayee, Alok Kumar Pandey, Devendra Parmar, Alok Dhawan
Toxicology in Vitro (2007)
Anubha Mudawal, Ankita Srivastava, Anshuman Singh, Jai Shankar, Sanjay Yadav, Manisha Mishra, Pradhyumna K. Singh, Vinay K. Khanna, Devendra Parmar
Food and Chemical Toxicology (2018)
11) Prenatal exposure to lambda-cyhalothrin alters brain dopaminergic signaling in developing rats
Yogesh K. Dhuriya, Pranay Srivastava, Rajendra K. Shukla, Richa Gupta, Dhirendra Singh, Devendra Parmar, Aditya B. Pant, Vinay K. Khanna
Toxicology (2017)
Richa Gupta, Rajendra K. Shukla, Ankita Pandey, Tanuj Sharma, Yogesh K. Dhuriya, Pranay Srivastava, Manjul P. Singh, Mohammad Imran Siddiqi, Aditya B. Pant, Vinay K. Khanna
Scientific Reports (2018)
13) Anomalies in ovary following oral exposure to oxytocin: mechanistic studies
Manjari Mishra, Vivek Mishra, Bhushan P. Chaudhuri, Vinay K. Khanna, Sanjay Mehrotra, Shakir Ali, Mukul Das
Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.) (2013)
Mahendra P. Kashyap, Vivek Kumar, Abhishek K. Singh, Vinay K. Tripathi, Sadaf Jahan, Ankita Pandey, Ritesh K. Srivastava, Vinay K. Khanna, Aditya B. Pant
Molecular Neurobiology (2015)
Abhishek K. Singh, Mahendra P. Kashyap, Sadaf Jahan, Vivek Kumar, Vinay K. Tripathi, Maqsood A. Siddiqui, Sanjay Yadav, Vinay K. Khanna, Vinita Das, Swatantra K. Jain, Aditya B. Pant
Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology (2012)
Pranay Srivastava, Yogesh K. Dhuriya, Vivek Kumar, Akriti Srivastava, Richa Gupta, Rajendra K. Shukla, Rajesh S. Yadav, Hari N. Dwivedi, Aditya B. Pant, Vinay K. Khanna
Neurotoxicology (2018)
Sushil K. Tripathi, Ritu Goyal, Mahendra P. Kashyap, Aditya B. Pant, Wahajul Haq, Pradeep Kumar, Kailash C. Gupta
Biomaterials (2012)
Rahul Kumar, Premendra D. Dwivedi, Alok Dhawan, Mukul Das, Kausar M. Ansari
Toxicological Sciences (2011)
Prachi Tewari, Payal Mandal, Ruchi Roy, Somya Asthana, Premendra D Dwivedi, Mukul Das, Anurag Tripathi
Toxicology Letters (2017)
Alok Kumar Verma, Akanksha Sharma, Sandeep Kumar, Rinkesh Kumar Gupta, Dinesh Kumar, Kriti Gupta, B.H. Giridhar, Mukul Das, Premendra D. Dwivedi
Molecular Immunology (2016)
21) ZnO nanoparticles induced adjuvant effect via toll-like receptors and Src signaling in Balb/c mice
Ruchi Roy, Dinesh Kumar, Akanksha Sharma, Parul Gupta, Bhushan P. Chaudhari, Anurag Tripathi, Mukul Das, Premendra D. Dwivedi
Toxicology Letters (2014)
Rahul Kumar, Shamshad Alam, Bhushan P Chaudhari, Premendra D Dwivedi, Swatantra K Jain, Kausar M Ansari, Mukul Das
Carcinogenesis (2013)
23) Anomalies in ovary following oral exposure to oxytocin: mechanistic studies
Manjari Mishra, Vivek Mishra, Bhushan P. Chaudhuri, Vinay K. Khanna, Sanjay Mehrotra, Shakir Ali, Mukul Das
Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.) (2013)
Ruchi Roy, Vyom Parashar, L.K.S. Chauhan, Rishi Shanker, Mukul Das, Anurag Tripathi, Premendra Dhar Dwivedi
Toxicology in Vitro (2014)
25) Zinc oxide nanoparticles induce apoptosis by enhancement of autophagy via PI3K/Akt/mTOR inhibition
Ruchi Roy, Sunil Kumar Singh, L.K.S. Chauhan, Mukul Das, Anurag Tripathi, Premendra D. Dwivedi
Toxicology Letters (2014)
26) Benzanthrone induced immunotoxicity via oxidative stress and inflammatory mediators in Balb/c mice
Prachi Tewari, Ruchi Roy, Sakshi Mishra, Payal Mandal, Ashish Yadav, Bhushan P. Chaudhari, Rajnish K. Chaturvedi, Premendra D. Dwivedi, Anurag Tripathi, Mukul Das
Immunobiology (2015)
Sandeep Kumar, Alok Kumar Verma, Akanksha Sharma, Ruchi Roy, Dinesh Kumar, Giridhar BH, Anurag Tripathi, Bhushan P. Chaudhari, Mukul Das, S.K. Jain, Premendra D. Dwivedi
International Immunopharmacology (2014)
Rinkesh Kumar Gupta, Sandeep Kumar, Kriti Gupta, Akanksha Sharma, Ruchi Roy, Alok Kumar Verma, Bhushan P. Chaudhari, Mukul Das, Irfan Ahmad Ansari, Premendra D. Dwivedi
Journal of Immunotoxicology (2016)
Naveen Kumar Singhal, Swati Agarwal, Priyanka Bhatnagar, Manindra Nath Tiwari, Shashi Kant Tiwari, Garima Srivastava, Pradeep Kumar, Brashket Seth, Devendra Kumar Patel, Rajnish Kumar Chaturvedi, Mahendra Pratap Singh, Kailash Chand Gupta
Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology (2015)
Richa Pahuja, Kavita Seth, Anshi Shukla, Rakesh Shukla, Priyanka Bhatnagar, Lalit Kumar Singh Chauhan, Prem Narain Saxena, Jharna Arun, Bhushan Pradosh Chaudhari, Devendra Kumar Patel, Sheelendra Pratap Singh, Rakesh Shukla, Vinay Kumar Khanna, Pradeep Kumar, Rajnish Kumar Chaturvedi, Kailash Chand Gupta
ACS Nano (2015)
31) Engineered polyallylamine nanoparticles for efficient in vitro transfection
Atul Pathak, Anita Aggarwal, Raj K. Kurupati, Soma Patnaik, Archana Swami, Yogendra Singh, Pradeep Kumar, Suresh P. Vyas, Kailash C. Gupta
Pharmaceutical Research (2007)
32) Synthesis of biocompatible iron oxide nanoparticles as a drug delivery vehicle
Krupa Kansara, Pal Patel, Ritesh K Shukla, Alok Pandya, Rishi Shanker, Ashutosh Kumar, Alok Dhawan
International Journal of Nanomedicine (2018)
Jahan, D. Kumar, S. Singh, V. Kumar, A. Srivastava, A. Pandey, C. S. Rajpurohit, V. K. Khanna, A. B. Pant
Molecular Neurobiology (2018)
Honestly, the best is not appointed as Scientist. The one gets appointed who is a sycophant with required degree on paper. With manipulations, they get hired while good and qualified is ignored. The qualified never do hobnobbing and rely on their education and talent while sycophants and informants to administration get hired because they are viewed as yes man. What will happen, a disaster which see destruction of Indian scientists image in India and abroad.
The truth is even bitter. The administration has not credited certain individuals in patent and paper by ITRC and CDRI. This is being done purposefully. A reproductive toxivologist dif not get sn intetviee when position is advertised for Reproductive Toxicology. Eliminating qualified candidate to select their own has been the norm at ITRC and CDRI. You can never anticipate better result than forgery and manipulation to remain viable in the job.
Rais Ansari
There is a severe lack of latest equipments , funds and manpower. At the same time papers published is the major yardstick. Not that the situation is different from other institutions. We must develop our institutions with more funds and manpower to solve such problems.
This is a complete nonsense argument..India has enough funding, even some good foreign institutes doe not have equipment what these Indian Institutes does have.. ..Its Indian mentality to manipulate things…Moreover, these people are also not qualified to be as scientist in such reputed institutes..its all due to bad politics they get chances….
Sir we pay Rs 15000 per month to qualified PhDs which is less than what I pay to my house helper. Many a times even that is not paid in time. I spend my tax paid money. Possibly you are blessed with equipments and support. Happy for you