Should Covaxin trial continue till 130 cases are recorded?

Considering that recruitment and complete vaccination of all trial participants has been achieved, the drug regulator has to take a decision on the number of cases required for licensing — currently available cases (which is likely to be more than 43), second endpoint of 87 cases or 130 cases as originally planned, for which the trial will have to continue for a longer time. Will it be ethical to continue the trial and deny the protection of the vaccine to the placebo arm when cases are surging in many States?

Bharat Biotech began the phase-3 trial of Covaxin on November 11, 2020 and completed the enrolment of all 25,800 volunteers on January 7, 2021. The last of the phase-3 trial participants received the second dose in the third week of February this year.

According to details posted on the clinical trial registry, the company had planned to “continue the phase-3 trial until 130 study participants developed PCR-confirmed symptomatic COVID-19 disease during follow-up beginning 14 days after the second dose of vaccine or placebo”.

The first and second interim analyses of phase-3 trial are planned to be conducted when 43 and 87 RT-PCR confirmed symptomatic COVID-19 cases get reported. On March 3, Bharat Biotech announced the interim analysis of 43 cases; the vaccine was found to have an 80.6% point estimate of vaccine efficacy.

There are a fairly large number of participants in each group — 12,900 people in each arm — and as against 36 cases in the placebo group, there were just seven cases in the vaccine arm. “This is an unambiguous reflection of high vaccine efficacy, calculated as 80.6%. We will have to wait for the announcement of the 95% confidence range, but eyeball assessment is that it has to be fairly narrow on account of the huge denominator,” says virologist Dr. Jacob John, formerly with CMC Vellore.  

Four months for 43 cases to accrue

The next interim analysis will be carried out when the total number of symptomatic COVID-19 cases reach 87. With the phase-3 trial beginning only on November 11, nearly two months after the pandemic had reached a peak in India, it took nearly four months for the first 43 cases to accrue.

“The total number of symptomatic COVID-19 cases in the 25,800 study volunteers happened to be only 43 after nearly four months, which is a reflection of the relatively low prevalence of infection in the country during the trial period. The original expectation was that there would be 130 cases by end-February,” says Dr. John. “The epidemic in India peaked on September 16 and the trial started two months later. Hence, the lower-than-expected numbers are no surprise.”

What the spike in cases mean for the trial  

Though an uptick in daily cases has been reported from 21 States, 10 States are witnessing a surge — Maharashtra, Punjab, Gujarat, Chandigarh, Madhya Pradesh, Karnataka, Chhattisgarh, Haryana, Delhi and Tamil Nadu. Of these, the situation is particularly concerning in Maharashtra, Punjab, Chandigarh and Gujarat. The 39,687 cases reported on March 18 is higher than what was reported on November 29 last year (39,036 cases). “There is a sustained and steady increase in cases in these 10 States, making it clear that the second wave has set in,” says Dr. Rijo John, Health Economist and Consultant based in Kochi. The seven-day average of daily cases has more than doubled from 10,986 on February 8 to 29,334 on March 18, a 167% increase. And the seven-day average test positivity rate has doubled from 1.6 to 3.2% during the same period, says Dr. Rijo John.

There is a good possibility that the spike in cases in a handful of States would get reflected in the infection/disease frequency in the trial sites and trial participants. Though Bharat Biotech has 25 trial sites spread across 11 States, there are no trial sites in Punjab, Chandigarh and Kerala, which is still reporting high numbers — about 1,900 cases as on March 18. The company has five trial sites in Maharashtra (two in Mumbai alone), two sites in Tamil Nadu (including one in Chennai), Karnataka (Bengaluru being one), and Haryana but just one trial site in Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Delhi.

The way the daily cases are increasing in about a dozen States, Dr. Giridhara Babu, epidemiologist at the Public Health Foundation of India, Bengaluru feels that many more States might witness a surge. How much the increase would be in each State would depend on numerous factors including daily testing rate, adherence to COVID-19 precautions and vaccination rate.

It would have probably taken four-six months for another 43 cases to accrue, but due to the spike currently seen in 10 States that endpoint would be reached earlier. According to reliable sources in Bharat Biotech, the company is expecting 43 more symptomatic cases (totally 87 symptomatic cases) to accrue earliest by April or latest by June. Dr. Babu thinks the final target of 130 cases too can be reached soon, considering the way the cases are spiking in many States.  

Continuing the trial when cases are spiking

Considering that recruitment and complete vaccination of all trial participants has been achieved, the drug regulator has to take a decision on the number of cases required for licensing. It could be currently available cases (which is likely to be more than 43), second endpoint of 87 cases or 130 cases as originally planned, for which the trial will have to continue for a longer time.

The challenge will be in continuing the trial with the original number of participants when there is a surge in many States. Four priority groups are already eligible for vaccination. “It will be unethical to withhold information from participants about the priority groups that are eligible for vaccination. The participants falling in the priority groups can be requested to continue in the study for the successful completion of the trial but participants should be free to withdraw at any point of time,” says Dr. Anant Bhan, global health and bioethics researcher based in Bhopal. Besides healthcare workers, over 2,400 participants over 60 years and 4,500 people with comorbidities have been included in the trial.

Efficacy data from 87 or 130 cases only of academic interest

“The vaccine was approved for restricted emergency use under a ‘clinical trial mode’ even when no efficacy data was available. When the first interim analysis of 43 cases showed nearly 81% efficacy, the ‘clinical trial mode’ was removed. Since the vaccine is already rolled out to the priority groups, efficacy data from 87 or 130 cases is only of academic interest. It doesn’t make any difference on the ground,” says virologist Dr. Shahid Jameel, Director of the Trivedi School of Biosciences at Ashoka University. “It will be unethical to deny the vaccine to those participants in the placebo group who fall under any of the priority groups and thus eligible to receive the vaccine.”

Dr. Babu too feels it will be unethical to deny the vaccine to trial participants who are eligible to receive the vaccine, particularly when many States are reporting a spike in daily cases.

Dr. V. Ravi, neurovirologist formerly with NIMHANS says the second wave has already begun in India. He therefore expects another 43 symptomatic cases among the trial participants to show up by end-April. “We should wait for the second endpoint — 87 cases — before unblinding the trial,” he says. “Waiting for 130 cases, especially when cases are surging in many States, will unnecessarily put the trial participants who have received a placebo at great risk. It is unethical.”

“For feeling confident about high vaccine efficacy (80.6%), the available data are sufficient, but whether DCGI will feel confident to license the vaccine or not is a call the drug regulator alone can make,” says Dr. Jacob John. 

Published in The Hindu on March 20, 2021


One thought on “Should Covaxin trial continue till 130 cases are recorded?

  1. The call for doing away with the planned end points for the second interim analysis and the final one is not the solution to the unethical approval of the vaccine on purely political grounds without any data. Doing this in the name of being unethical is a joke. The credibility of Covaxin and Bharat Biotech will further get damaged. Is this the way? -approve without data ( ethical? ), get interim data but do not publish or make public (ethical ?), do not follow the predetermined statistical end points in the name of depriving those who get placebo of the vaccine . Now it is all ethical !

Comments are closed.